Tag Archives: reese witherspoon

Great cast doesn’t prevent ‘This Means War’ from being another bland rom-com — movie review

#9 of 100 on my 100 Movies I’ve Never Seen Before Challenge (part II)

So, going into this movie, I thought “This Means War” would be a complete train wreck, which it’s not. The problem is that it isn’t particularly good either, which ends up being the most disappointing thing about it because it seems like it could have been so much better. The movie is about two CIA agents, who are also best bros, who end up falling for the same girl. Rather than step aside for the other, they let the girl decided who she likes better. The result ends up being a somewhat entertaining but mostly flat attempt from McG and the cast.

“This Means War” stars Chris Pine (Star Trek, Unstoppable), Tom Hardy (Warrior, The Dark Knight Rises) and Reese Witherspoon (Walk the Line, Legally Blonde), who have all been good in other movies. Here, for whatever reason, they feel seriously miscast in their roles. Hardy and Pine are good together and you’re left wondering what they’d be like partnered up in a better action movie. Unfortunately, it’s Reese Witherspoon who seems like a huge part of the overall chemistry problem with this flick. She’s still cute and all, but she may be past playing the cutesy girl parts.

However, she isn’t the worst actor in the movie, by far. That designation goes to Chelsea Handler, who once again proves to be just completely terrible. Her character is supposed to be the majority of the female comic relief but you’ll find yourself wishing she was killed off as part of collateral damage– but she’s not. I seriously don’t get what people like about her or why she is cast in anything– ever. She’s flat terrible and every scene she is in is groan inducing.

Director McG isn’t a terrible filmmaker, but he just can’t seem to make a movie that works on every level. The “Charlie’s Angels” movies had more bad moments that ruined any good. The same with “Terminator Salvation”. He just can’t seem to put it all together. This movie seems like the studio couldn’t keep their hands out of the cookie jar, as evidenced by the three alternate endings. Maybe that’s what McG’s problem is– he can’t tell the studios to leave his movie alone. The movie has a lot of uneven moments and just when you think the characters are developing, they don’t. It all seems dumbed down a little too much.

“This Means War” has some great moments, such as when Tom Hardy’s character plays a ruthless game of paintball but you will constantly wish there was more to it. For every clever moment, there is three or four idiotic moments that make you question the intelligence of every character involved…and they’re all supposed to be really smart. At the end of the day, “This Means War” is an entertaining movie to watch with the wife or girlfriend for some mindless entertainment but that doesn’t mean it’s any good.

Check out some of my other movie reviews at Examiner.com.

‘How Do You Know’ …when you have a bad movie? — movie review

t’s a terribly disappointing moment when you are watching a movie directed by a very good director with very likable actors and you realize the movie is terrible. It’s even worse when you can’t quite pinpoint what is the downfall of the movie. Unfortunately that’s where I was with “How Do You Know”. The movie is directed by James L. Brooks, who directed the excellent “As Good as it Gets” and the even better “Broadcast News”. It stars Kansas City boy Paul Rudd, Reese Witherspoon, Owen Wilson and Jack Nicholson. Between the director and the actors it sounds like a can’t miss hit….but it’s not– at least I don’t think it is. Continue reading ‘How Do You Know’ …when you have a bad movie? — movie review